Are Detroit citizens’ Fourth Amendment rights being respected? We consider an alleged violation of rights by drug crime enforcement officials in Burley v. Gagacki.

Aggressive Criminal Defense Blog

Have Federal Drug Crime Enforcement Officials in Detroit Lost Sight of the Fourth Amendment? A Review of Burley v Gagacki

Designed To Protect From Unlawful Search and Seizure The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution is designed to protect us from unreasonable searches and seizures. The recent Sixth Circuit opinion in the case of Burley v. Gagacki is enough to make you wonder how well that is working in Detroit. In this case, it […]

[Read More]

When is a Child Witness Unavailable? A Comment on People vs Duncan.

It is a common scenario for Michigan criminal defense attorneys—a witness is available for testimony in the preliminary examination to be held in a district court. The attorney has to make a recommendation as to whether to hold the examination or waive it. Most effective trial attorneys would hold the exam in most cases where […]

[Read More]

People v. Prominski: Ionia Pastor Cannot be Prosecuted for Failure to Report Sexual Abuse by the Child’s Father

In People v. Prominski, the Court of Appeals addressed whether a pastor is obligated under MCL 722.633(2) to report child abuse when alerted by a parishioner who was asking for the pastor’s guidance on the issue. The case originated in the Ionia Circuit Court. This opinion was released for publication on August 22, 2013. This […]

[Read More]

Sixth Circuit Comes to the Aid of Man Accused of Assaulting an Officer during a Wayne County Jail Transfer

In U.S. v. Zabawa, a federal inmate assaulted a law enforcement officer while in custody. The defendant appealed his resulting convictions. This opinion was released on June 3, 2013. The assault occurred after a transfer from Wayne County Jail to the federal courthouse for sentencing. The defendant lunged at the officer and started punching him. […]

[Read More]

SAGINAW COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT OVERTURNED MURDER CHARGES BECAUSE OF ERRORS BY THE TRIAL COURT JUDGE

In People v. Mitchell, a case arising out of the Saginaw County Circuit Court, the Court of Appeals reversed a defendant’s convictions due to lack of a specific jury instruction and insufficiency of evidence. The opinion was released for publication on June 6, 2013. The defendant was convicted by jury of second-degree murder and carrying […]

[Read More]

U. S. SUPREME COURT RULES THAT ALL SENTENCE ENHANCEMENT FACTORS MUST BE PROVEN BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT: AN EXPLANATION OF ALLEYNE V. UNITED STATES

In a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court held in Alleyne v. United States that any fact that by law increases a criminal penalty is an “element” of an offense that must be submitted to a jury and determined beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, Harris v. United States is overruled. The opinion was released […]

[Read More]

Bay County CSC Conviction Overturned Due to Violation of the Michigan Rules of Evidence Regarding Child Testimony

In People v. Burns, the Michigan Supreme Court granted the prosecution’s application for leave to appeal based on the Court of Appeals’ reversal of a criminal conviction due to evidentiary issues. The case originated in the Bay County Circuit Court. The opinion was released on June 18, 2013. Bible School Instructor Reports Sexual Abuse On […]

[Read More]

What is Left of the Fifth Amendment? Even Silence May Not be Enough to Preserve Your Fifth Amendment Rights.

Sometimes you have to wonder if the U.S. Supreme Court has lost sight of the Constitution altogether. The Miranda decision itself moved the focus from the constitutional right to remain silent to the act of advising the suspect of that right. Today, police officers are given forms and cards to read to make sure they […]

[Read More]

U.S. Supreme Court Blesses Collection of DNA for People Arrested but not Convicted. Maryland v. King is Concerning to Advocates of Constitutional Protections.

In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Maryland v. King that when a person is arrested for a serious crime, which is supported by probable cause, taking and analyzing DNA from a cheek swab is a legitimate booking procedure, like taking mug shots and fingerprinting. The opinion was released on June 3, […]

[Read More]

MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT TAKES A STEP TOWARD RIGHTING THE SHIP ON DRUGGED DRIVING LAWS. A COMMENT ON PEOPLE V. COON AND THE MICHIGAN MEDICAL MARIJUANA ACT

In People v. Koon, the Michigan Supreme Court unanimously held that, under the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act (MMMA), a qualifying patient may not be arrested or prosecuted for the medical use and internal possession of marijuana while driving if possession does not exceed 2.5 ounces. However, if the defendant is shown to have been under […]

[Read More]

As Seen in:

Avvo 10.0 attorneynewsweek time logo-northern-express mlive logo-24-hour-news-8 logo-wood-tv logo-montmorency-tribune logo-midland-daily-news logo-channel5Avvo Top Contributor

Back to
Top ▲
Aggressive Criminal Defense